Colder or warmer offices could cut rates of diabetes and obesity, study finds
A fluctuating temperature may be better for our health than the 'comfort zone' of about 21 degrees Celsius
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Arguments over the office thermostat have become part of everyday life.
But a new academic paper suggests abandoning the usual compromise of about 21 to 22 degrees Celsius could help reduce levels of obesity and diabetes as both colder and warmer temperatures increase the body’s metabolism.
For example, a couple of working weeks in “mild cold” could have an effect on diabetes comparable to “the best available” drugs and exercise techniques, the researchers said.
They also highlighted the historic increase in temperatures considered comfortable in homes and offices during winter and a decrease in summer.
For example, a Dutch newspaper in 1872 reported that a comfortable room temperature was between 13C and 15C.
The lead author of the study, Professor Wouter van Marken Lichtenbelt, of Maastricht University, said: “It has previously been assumed that stable fixed indoor temperatures would satisfy comfort and health in most people.
“However, this research indicates that mild cold and variable temperatures may have a positive effect on our health and at the same time are acceptable or even may create pleasure.”
The paper, published in the journal Building Research & Information, said: “The concepts of comfort and health may be related but are not synonyms.
“New knowledge has been gathered regarding metabolic health effects of temperature exposure outside the human thermal comfort zone.
“Mild cold and warm environments increase metabolism, thereby targeting obesity by counterbalancing excess energy intake. Furthermore, mild cold influences glucose metabolism.
“Ten days of intermittent mild cold exposure in type 2 diabetes patients increased insulin sensitivity, and thereby glucose handling by more than 40 per cent. This is comparable with the best available pharmaceutical or physical activity therapies.
“There are indications that cardiovascular parameters may be positively affected by regular exposure to heat and cold.”
They said this “probably” did not mean people should “suffer from discomfort” for the sake of their health, either because people would get used to it or might actually begin to enjoy the rise and fall of the mercury.
“Prolonged temporal excursions outside the thermal comfort zone result in acclimatisation resulting in increased comfort ratings,” the paper said.
“Low or high temperatures in a dynamic thermal environment may be perceived as acceptable or even pleasant.”
They suggested further research into temperature and comfort in “actual living conditions”.
“This information is needed to support the design of healthy, comfortable and energy-friendly indoor environments,” the researchers said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments