Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Men who have lopsided ears might not make the earth move

Chris Barnard
Monday 15 January 1996 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sex may be for procreation, but orgasms are really why we do it. Without this recreational incentive we probably would not go to all that bother. As Lord Chesterfield famously advised his son: "The pleasure is momentary, the position ridiculous and the expense damnable."

Biologically, however, that moment of pleasure, the orgasmic pay-off, is not just a sensory bribe. In women, at least, it seems to be an important factor in the scramble among sperm to fertilise the egg. Recent evidence suggests that the timing of female orgasm relative to the male partner's ejaculation may influence sperm retention and allow the woman to manipulate the chances of the sperm from a particular male fertilising her egg. Orgasms thus become an important means of exercising mating preferences. If this is the case, the achievement and timing of female orgasm should reflect the desirability of the male partner. Studies by Randy Thornhill and his colleagues at the University of New Mexico suggest that it does, and that what makes a male a real earth-mover is the evenness of his features.

Evolutionary biologists have recently discovered that a form of bodily asymmetry may be an important factor in the mating preferences of several species. Human beings are bilaterally symmetrical - the left-hand side of our bodies is, at least outwardly, a mirror image of the right-hand side. But this symmetry is not exact. There are, for example, left-right differences in the size of hands, feet, ankles and ears. This is an example of what is known as fluctuating asymmetry because it varies randomly within populations.

In bilaterally symmetrical species, females seem to prefer males whose paired features show little difference between one side of their body and the other. There is a good biological reason for this. Fluctuating asymmetry appears to be a symptom of disturbance during early stages of the male's physical development, perhaps as a result of nutritional stress, disease or simply low genetic quality. If susceptibility to these problems is heritable, lop-sided males will make a poor choice of father for the female's offspring.

Evidence from Thornhill and co-workers' studies suggests that asymmetry in humans (here measured as left-right differences in hand, foot, wrist, ankle and ear size) has a marked effect on male mating success. Not only are relatively symmetrical men more likely to be judged attractive, but they also have more sexual partners and sexual relationships outside their long-term pair bond, and achieve first copulation with a new partner after shorter periods of courtship. Most recently, in research just published in the scientific journal Animal Behaviour, Thornhill's group has found that the tendency for women to orgasm during intercourse is influenced by the asymmetry of their male partner.

Even when other features of male and female partners and difference in the nature of individual relationships were taken into account, women in Thornhill's study turned out to have more orgasms during intercourse when their partners showed low fluctuating asymmetry. The fact that asymmetry affected orgasm during copulation, rather than foreplay, is important. Earlier work by Robin Baker and Mark Bellis has shown that orgasms at this time tend to result in a high degree of sperm retention, possibly through a muscular "upsuck" effect. Orgasms during foreplay tend to increase loss of sperm through later flowback from the vagina.

Few other features of men predicted female copulatory orgasm, although facial attractiveness and body weight had some effect independently of asymmetry. The upshot thus seems to be that copulatory orgasm in women is designed to retain the sperm of men with a good developmental pedigree, and also those that are facially attractive and large. Facial attractiveness and body weight both correlate positively with symmetry in a number of studies, so it may be that they act as easy indices of the developmental quality of the male. In a species in which females frequently mate with more than one male and pitch their sperm into a competitive play-off, orgasm seems to be a fun way of loading the dice in the female's favour.

CHRIS BARNARD

The writer is in the Behaviour and Ecology Research Group at Nottingham University.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in