'Meat tax' would be supported by public eventually, report claims
Many people are unaware the meat industry contributes 15 per cent of the world's emissions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Taxing meat in order to improve public health and tackle climate change would eventually be welcomed by the public, a leading international think tank has claimed.
The Chatham House report also says the public misunderstands the link between meat consumption and climate change as peoples’ “understanding of how emissions occur” tends to not include the impact of the meat industry.
Meat production and consumption contributes 15 per cent of the world’s emissions – more than cars, trains, planes and ships combined.
The amount eaten is also changing. Many individuals in developing nations start supplementing their diet as they become wealthier, simultaneously; western nations’ consumption of meat is plateauing.
The report, jointly researched with the University of Glasgow and released ahead of the world leaders’ UN summit in Paris on global warming, suggests taxation may help to curb meat consumption in western nations, if implemented alongside a strong public information campaign.
“Governments overestimate the risk of public backlash,” the report emphasised.
“The idea that interventions like this are too politically sensitive and too difficult to implement is unjustified,” Lead author Laura Wellesley told the Guardian. She added any public dissatisfaction would “likely be short-lived”.
Moreover, the gains would eclipse the policy’s temporary unpopularity. The report estimates “worldwide adoption of a healthy diet would generate over a quarter of the emission reductions needed by 2050”.
The report’s results draw on data from 1,000 participants in 12 different countries, collected last year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments