Mammals bulking up instead of growing bigger brains helped them survive post dinosaur extinction, study says
Big brains may not always be better to invade new environments or survive extinctions, say scientists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Prehistoric mammals bulking up, instead of developing bigger brains, may have increased their chances of survival once dinosaurs became extinct, a new study has suggested.
The research, published on Thursday in the journal Science, said mammals boosted their body size for the first 10 million years after dinosaurs died out. This helped them adapt to radical shifts in the make-up of Earth’s animal kingdom.
Scientists, including those from the University of Edinburgh in the UK, said the size of mammals’ brains decreased compared with their body weight following the catastrophic asteroid impact 66 million years ago that ended the reign of dinosaurs.
Until now, researchers said it was unclear how prehistoric mammals developed in the first few million years following the mass extinction.
To shed light on this mystery, they performed CT X-ray scans on newly discovered fossils from the 10-million-year period after the extinction, called the Paleocene.
Findings revealed that the relative brain sizes of mammals at first decreased because their body size increased at a much faster rate.
The study said prehistoric animals relied heavily on their sense of smell, while their vision and other senses were less well developed – indicating it may have been initially more beneficial to be big than highly intelligent in order to survive in the post-dinosaur era.
Then about 10 million years later, early members of modern mammal groups, such as primates, began to develop larger brains and a more complex range of senses and motor skills.
Such traits at a time when competition for resources was far greater would have improved their survival chances, scientists said.
Based on the findings, they said big brains may not always be better to invade new environments or survive extinctions.
“Large brains are expensive to maintain and, if not necessary to acquire resources, would have probably been detrimental for the survival of early placental mammals in the chaos and upheaval after the asteroid impact,” study lead researcher Ornella Bertrand, of the University of Edinburgh’s School of GeoSciences, said in a statement.
Since modern-day mammals are very intelligent, it is easy to assume that big brains helped our ancestors outlast the dinosaurs and survive extinction.
But this may have not been so.
“The mammals that usurped the dinosaurs were fairly dim-witted, and only millions of years later did many types of mammals develop bigger brains as they were competing with each other to form new ecosystems,” said study senior author Steve Brusatte, also based at the University of Edinburgh.
The findings, according to the researchers, can lead to a better understanding of these bizarre prehistoric animals and the evolution of the mammalian brain.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments