Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Blood test could pinpoint cause of brain injury in newborn babies – study

The findings could eventually lead to a simple test to quickly diagnose brain injury in newborns and help with treatment decisions, researchers said.

Nina Massey
Friday 02 February 2024 05:00 EST
The research looked at babies with a type of brain injury caused by hypoxia (Dominic Lipinski/PA)
The research looked at babies with a type of brain injury caused by hypoxia (Dominic Lipinski/PA) (PA Wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A blood test could pinpoint the cause of brain injury in newborn babies, and help identify the best treatment for them, a new study suggests.

The research looked at babies with a type of brain injury caused by hypoxia – a lack of oxygen.

It found that signals which are detectable in the blood can point to the cause of the injury and tell doctors if the baby is likely to respond to cooling treatment – commonly used to treat brain injury.

The findings could eventually lead to a simple test to quickly diagnose brain injury in newborns and help with treatment decisions, the Imperial College London researchers suggested.

The key for clinicians, anywhere in the world, is to be able to identify which type of brain injury they are dealing with as soon as possible – and that’s something we’re currently working on

Professor Sudhin Thayyil

The study included babies from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) as well as high-income countries (HICs).

It found a notable difference in gene expression – the process by which specific genes are activated to produce a required protein – between the two groups, suggesting a different underlying cause of brain injury.

According to the researchers, the findings indicate that newborn brain injury in poorer countries could be a result of multiple factors such as poor nutrition or infection.

While in wealthier countries, it was more likely to be a single cause such as complications during birth.

Lead investigator Professor Sudhin Thayyil from the department of brain sciences at Imperial said: “The gene expression patterns we saw in babies from LMICs were similar to what you would see in people with sleep apnoea, suggesting that they experienced intermittent hypoxia in the womb and at birth.

“We believe this is brought on by multiple chronic stresses during pregnancy such as poor nutrition or infection, as well as the normal labour process and uterine contractions, which leads to further hypoxia and ultimately injury to the baby’s brain.

We were expecting to see some differences in gene expression between babies in the cohorts – but not such a dramatic divergence

Professor Swati Manerkar

“On the other hand, gene expression patterns in babies from HICs suggested a single, acute cause of brain injury, for example complications during birth like maternal bleeding, leading to a sudden drop in blood oxygen levels in the foetus.”

Professor Thayyil added: “The key for clinicians, anywhere in the world, is to be able to identify which type of brain injury they are dealing with as soon as possible – and that’s something we’re currently working on.”

Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE) is a type of brain injury sometimes referred to as birth asphyxia, which occurs when a baby’s brain does not get enough oxygen before or shortly after birth.

Experts say that across the world it is a leading cause of death and disabilities – including cerebral palsy, epilepsy, deafness or blindness – among babies born at full-term, affecting around three million babies every year.

South Asia, and particularly India, has the most cases in the world.

Previous research in low and middle-income countries suggested that whole-body cooling, which is used to treat the condition, actually worsened the condition in babies with HIE and might have even increased the risk of death.

The new study helps explain why there is a difference in response between the two groups of babies.

What we are seeing are very different causes of brain injury between the two groups, with different characteristics, which also helps to explain why some babies respond to cooling and others are harmed by it

Professor Swati Manerkar

The research, led by Imperial and its South Asian partners, included 35 babies born with HIE in Italy (a HIC), and 99 babies from LMICs in South Asia (India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh).

Blood samples were taken shortly after birth and the babies were assessed at 18 months of age.

Around half the babies in the South Asian group died or developed severe disabilities, while a quarter died or developed severe disabilities in the Italian group.

Study co-author Professor Swati Manerkar, from Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College in Mumbai, India, said: “We were expecting to see some differences in gene expression between babies in the cohorts – but not such a dramatic divergence.

“It clearly shows that what we are seeing are very different causes of brain injury between the two groups, with different characteristics, which also helps to explain why some babies respond to cooling and others are harmed by it.”

The researchers stressed that the differences were not related to ethnicity, but rather socioeconomic factors.

The findings are published in the journal JAMA Network Open.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in