How old is the moon? Scientists put formation forward 100 million years
Rock samples from Apollo 16 mission finally analysed show the moon is millions of years younger than previously thought
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The moon is much younger than scientists have been led to believe, according to researchers analysing samples taken from the Apollo 16 mission.
The prevailing theory surrounding the creation of the moon is that a Mars-sized body known as 'Theia' collided with a newly formed proto-earth approximately 4.56 billion years ago, shortly after the formation of the solar system.
The massive impact caused melted material to break off into pieces in space, before eventually re-joining to form the moon.
As the Moon cooled, this magma ocean solidified into different mineral components, the lightest of which floated upwards to form the oldest layer of crust.
New analysis of material collected from it's surface suggests that the moon is 100 million years younger than previously thought.
A piece of lunar rock sample gathered in the Apollo 16 mission of 1972 has been analaysed by researchers at the University of Copenhagen, using newly refined techniques to assess the age of the sample.
The team of scientists, led by James Connelly from the Centre for Star and Planet Formation, examined the isotopes of the elements lead and neodymium to place the age of a sample of a FAN at 4.36 billion years.
This is significantly younger than earlier estimates, which put the moon's age as nearly as old as the solar systems - 4.567 billion years.
Mr Connelly said: "Although the samples have been carefully stored at NASA Johnson Space Center since their return to Earth, we had to extensively pre-clean the samples using a new method to remove terrestrial lead contamination.
"Once we removed the contamination, we found that this sample is almost 100 million years younger than we expected."
The new, younger age obtained for the oldest lunar crust is similar to ages obtained for the oldest terrestrial minerals - zircons from Western Australia - suggesting that the oldest crust on both Earth and the Moon formed at approximately the same time.
The results of their study have been published in the journal Nature.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments