How Glastonbury Abbey's myths were invented by medieval monks on the make
Four-year archaeological study reveals monks spun mythical links to make it one of the country's richest monasteries
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
It has long been linked with the legend of King Arthur and the story of Joseph of Arimathea, but archaeologists have now torn apart a series of popular myths about Glastonbury Abbey, one of the most romantic religious sites in Britain.
They have sifted through hundreds of years of evidence and have found that stories about the abbey’s origins were most likely invented by medieval monks trying to turn a profit.
The abbey, in Somerset, was believed to have been founded by Joseph of Arimathea as Britain’s earliest church and was reputed to be King Arthur’s burial place. But those alluring myths have been dismissed by a team of archaeologists from the University of Reading following a four-year study.
Their analysis revealed how the medieval monks spun the abbey’s mythical links to make Glastonbury one of the richest monasteries in the country.
Professor Roberta Gilchrist, who led the study, said: “We took a step back from the myth and legends and used 21st-century technology to expose the abbey’s true history. This project has rewritten the history of Glastonbury Abbey.”
A key focus for the researchers was a re-examination of the work of Ralegh Radford, who excavated the site in the 1950s and 1960s.
Dr Radford claimed to have discovered Britain’s earliest Christian cemetery as well as the site of King Arthur’s grave – allegedly located by monks in 1181. But Arthur’s “grave” has now been found to contain material from the 11th to the 15th centuries, with no evidence linking it to the mythical king.
The new analysis has highlighted how the monks crafted the legends to restore the abbey’s fortunes after a devastating fire in 1184.
Professor Gilchrist said: “The monks needed to raise money by increasing the numbers of visiting pilgrims, which meant keeping the myths and legends alive.
“We found evidence that the monks laid out the buildings in a very distinctive way to emphasise the ‘earliest church’ story.
“The monks also deliberately designed the rebuilt church to look older. This swelled pilgrim numbers – and the abbey’s coffers.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments