Ability to count just like ‘basic senses’, brain research reveals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Scientists have discovered the part of the brain responsible for assessing numbers and found that it is laid out topographically so that its nerve cells have the shortest routes to communicate with one another.
Topographical layouts like this are usually associated with the primary senses such as sight, hearing, taste, touch and smell so this suggests that the ability to compare the amount of things – whether grains of sand on a beach of the number of bottles behind a bar – is also a basic “sense”.
“We use symbolic numbers to represent numerosity and other aspects of magnitude, but the symbol itself is only a representation,” said Benjamin Harvey of Utrecht University, who carried out the research published in the journal Science.
Assessing the quantity of something depends on processing visual information from the eye to the brain, while counting with numbers is about recognising the symbols and linking them to a designated quantity.
“This latter task relies on very different parts of the brain that specialize in written and spoken language,” Dr Harvey said.
The study involved asking volunteers to analyse a varying patterns of dots on a computer screen while attached of a functional magnetic resonance brain scanner, which could identify which parts of the brain were active in the task – revealing the involvement of the brain’s outer cortex.
“Every individual brain is a complex and very different system. I was very surprised then that the map we report is in such a consistent location between our subjects, and that numerosity preferences always increased in the same direction along the cortex,” Dr Harvey said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments