Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

`Scalded' sue McDonald's

Cathy Comerford
Thursday 06 August 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MCDONALD'S IS facing legal action by more than 20 people - some of whom have undergone skin grafts - who claim they were scalded by hot drinks bought at the chain's burger outlets.

The number of claims against the fast-food chain has doubled in the past week since the news that the firm has paid out thousands of pounds to a woman in a similar claim.

Larraine Coeshott, 33, whose leg was scarred after another customer spilt a cup of tea in her lap at a Norfolk branch of McDonald's in June 1997, received pounds 4,000 in an out-of-court settlement last month.

The case, thought to be the first of its kind in Britain, has now raised more than 20 people with similar claims. But although they welcomed the settlement, they did not expect the company to admit liability in all their cases.

Malcolm Johnson, of solicitors Palmer Wheeldon which is co-ordinating the claims, said: "At the moment we are preparing the cases but we do welcome McDonald's action in this particular instance. But in other cases where we have invited McDonald's to concede liability they have refused to do so. But it is good news that one person has got through. If McDonald's do wish to talk to us about settling then we are ready."

In a similar claim against McDonald's back in 1994, an American grandmother, Stella Liebeck, 81, was paid pounds 2m in damages, after she spilt a takeaway coffee in her lap.

A spokesman for McDonald's said: "Any claims that have been received have been dealt with on an individual basis. We have our own specifications for the temperatures that all our goods are produced and served at."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in