Saunders case goes to European court
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JAMES CUSICK
The former chairman of Guinness Ernest Saunders took his legal battle with the English legal system into its 10th year yesterday when the European Court of Human Rights began hearing his latest appeal.
The Strasbourg hearing was barely two months after the Court of Appeal in London rejected Saunders's attempt to clear his name. His counsel yesterday, Michael Beloff QC, claimed that denying Saunders his "right to silence" when he was under investigation by Department of Trade and Industry inspectors meant the court proceedings which followed had resulted in "unfairness".
If Saunders wins, the Government face paying millions of pounds in compensation.
Saunders was sentenced to five years' imprisonment in 1990. Along with three others - Jack Lyons, Gerald Ronson and Anthony Parnes - he was convicted on charges of theft, conspiracy and false accounting relating to Guinness's pounds 2.7bn takeover of Distillers in 1986.
Saunders's term was reduced to two years in 1991 by the Court of Appeal. He was released from open prison after serving only 10 months when he was diagnosed as having having pre-senile dementia.
The Strasbourg court will deliver its judgment at a later date.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments