Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sandline chief: We did nothing wrong

Andrew Buncombe
Tuesday 19 May 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE former Army officer at the centre of the "arms to Africa" affair yesterday said his mercenaries liaised with government officials every time they carried out an operation.

Speaking about the affair for the first time, Tim Spicer said Sandline International was "beholden" to tell the Government what it was doing.

The day after it was announced that Mr Spicer will not be prosecuted for an apparent breach of UN sanctions, he said he had clear government approval to ship arms to Sierra Leone in support of the ousted president, Ahmed Tejan Kabbah.

"It is really beholden on us to try and inform the relevant governments of what we have been asked to do. We would always inform those people we felt ought to be informed," he said.

His claim that officials were told every time an operation was planned will further focus attention on the inquiry that the Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, has launched into possible involvement of Foreign and Commonwealth Office officials in the shipment of arms to Sierra Leone last February.

Mr Spicer said: "My major irritation is that I have spent a great deal of my time working for the Government, in different political persuasions. What we did in Sierra Leone was designed for the good rather than the bad of the country. If one believes you acted with the approval of the Government, as represented by officials or whoever, it's pretty galling to be involved as part of a criminal investigation.

"That being said, I am delighted that there are going to be no criminal charges."

Customs and Excise, which conducted a six-week investigation into whether Sandline and others had broken the embargo banning arms sales to Sierra Leone, said on Monday that there would be no prosecution, because "circumstances leading up to the supply" of arms had made such a charge unfair. There were also claims that comments made by Tony Blair about the entire affair being a "hoo-ha" had made a prosecution impossible.

Mr Spicer would like to contribute to an independent inquiry, headed by Sir Thomas Legg, a former permanent secretary at the Lord Chancellor's Department.

Should he be asked, he will rebut Mr Cook's claim, on Monday, that there had only been one meeting between Foreign Office officials and Sandline and that the arms shipment was never mentioned. Sandline has always insisted that there were at least three official meetings in Britain, with more meetings with officials in West Africa.

He admitted that, while he believed he had clear approval, he had nothing in writing. He never met a minister but refused to say whether he had been told by officials that ministers had been told.

Mr Spicer also refused to give specific details of dates of meetings with officials, or the High Commissioner to Sierra Leone, Peter Penfold. Sandline also provided helicopters and pilots to Nigerian-led forces that liberated Freetown last February. "We flew ... day and night to help move troops and evacuate their casualties. Surely it must be right to help someone that is elected back to power, particularly in face of the savage, ruthless regime that ousted him," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in