Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Royal yacht taxes Labour minds

Anthony Bevins
Sunday 26 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

After twelve hours of complete confusion, Labour yesterday reaffirmed that it would not be spending any taxpayers' money on the replacement for the Royal Yacht, Britannia.

But last night a spokesman for Tony Blair's office said: "We are not ruling out for ever spending a penny on the royal yacht. We are not saying never ever a penny." Nothing could have been clearer than the guidance offered on Saturday; that Shadow Chancellor, Gordon Brown, had sent a message to the Queen, who is said to be unhappy at being in the centre of a political tug-of-war, letting it be known that Labour would not honour last week's Tory pledge to pay for a new pounds 60m yacht.

For good measure, and to firm up the non-attributable briefing given by Mr Brown's office, the defence spokesman John Reid went on BBC television on Saturday night to add: "We are saying that we will not fund, out of public expenditure, pounds 60m on a royal yacht when there are demands like health and education."

But there was a more equivocal line from Tony Blair's office, with one source suggesting that no one had said there would be no government money at all for the royal yacht.

Yesterday morning, Alistair Darling, shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury and Labour's spending axeman, went on BBC television's Breakfast with Frost to give the definitive Labour view - a reflection of the leader's line.

Frost's question was clear enough: "You have in this case, according to the stories, specifically decided that the royal yacht should not be part of your spending?" Mr Darling replied: "No, what we have said ... "

Frost interrupted: "You haven't. Oh, it's not..." Mr Darling continued, saying that the yacht had to be considered alongside other projects in education and the health service, but he did not rule out government spending.

That prompted Frost to ask: "So contrary though, Alistair, to the leaks yesterday to the papers, this decision has not been made and there may be taxpayers' money under Labour spent on Britannia?"

In spite of his frontbench colleague's appearance on BBC television news the night before, Mr Darling said: "Well, I do wish these people who write these stories would actually come and ask, rather than rely on leaks and so on."

Mr Darling later apologised for any confusion, indicating that there would indeed be no taxpayers' money for a royal yacht under Labour.

He said there was no money set aside for a royal yacht in Labour's spending plans for its first two years in office and, after that, it would have to take its chances against other, competing claims in health and education.

However, Labour would also be looking at other means of financing the replacement; a clear hint that private finance would be sought.

"I'm normally as clear as day," Mr Darling told The Independent. "I'm sorry if there was any confusion."

Last night, the line was that there was no budget for a royal yacht in Labour's first two-year spending plans. After that, the project would have to compete with education and health and, therefore, private finance would be sought.

But that did not mean that no taxpayers' money would be spent by a Labour Government on a royal yacht.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in