Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Roman armour unearthed

David Keys
Wednesday 01 October 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The first suit of Roman chain-mail armour ever found in Britain has been unearthed inside a Roman fort in South Shields near Newcastle. Its one of only seven complete examples known from the entire Roman world.

The suit - consisting of an estimated 30,000 iron rings - was discovered by archaeologist inside what is believed to have been a junior officer's room in a barrack block near the eastern wall of the fort. It is an important piece in the jigsaw of archaeological evidence which is shedding new light on a 1,700-year-old mystery. Excavations carried out by Tyne and Wear Museums Service have revealed that all the barrack blocks were burnt down in around 300AD. Up till now archaeologist thought they had been deliberately demolished to make way for newer buildings. Now, however, the pattern of fire damage and the fact that a valuable suit of armour was left inside one of the buildings suggests that the fire was either accidental or more probably the result of enemy action. If further analysis of the evidence confirms that the fort was attacked it would have far-reaching consequences for future understanding of the history of late Roman Britain.

It would strengthen the arguments of those academics who believe that external Barbarian attacks on Roman Britain started in the late third century AD rather than three generations later in the mid fourth.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in