Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Children’s clock business gets letter from Rolex demanding it ‘rebrand’

Oyster & Pop sell a collection of colourful wall clocks and charts designed to help children learn to tell the time

Lucy Skoulding
Thursday 19 January 2023 13:23 EST
Comments
Rolex is demanding that a children’s clock business rebrands
Rolex is demanding that a children’s clock business rebrands (AFP/ Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A children’s clock business has been sent a letter by luxury watch makers Rolex demanding it rebrands.

Oyster & Pop sell a collection of colourful wall clocks and charts designed to help children learn to tell the time, which retail at about £20.

The company was set up by sisters Emma Ross-McNairn and Sarah Davies and is named after Oyster Bend in Torbay, Devon, where they grew up.

But lawyers for the eight-billion dollar company Rolex wrote to ‘Oyster & Pop’ in early January to demand they rebrand.

Rolex claim it’s a similar name to their ‘Oyster Perpetual’ line of watches that sell for anywhere between four to ten thousand pounds.

The company argues that the “average, reasonably well-informed consumer” would likely call the Rolex line of watches to mind when looking at the Oyster & Pop logo.

The letter added: “Consumers will inevitably be misled into thinking that your products emanate from Rolex.”

As a result the lawyers have demanded the firm, based in Teignmouth, Devon, change its logo, website domain and name to avoid further action.

Director of Emma, 46, said the situation was “nonsense” and that the lawyer’s letters had been “bullish”.

She told the BBC: “If someone says oyster to me, the first thing I think of is the Oyster Card on the tube, not Rolex watches.

“I don’t think anyone could confuse our clocks as coming from Rolex.”

It is the second time Rolex have come after the company.

It previously beat the sisters by default in a trademark battle in the United States after Oyster & Pop proved unable to fund a legal battle over the issue.

During that battle, Rolex USA lawyers had told the sisters that changing their category filing from International Class (IC) 14 for clocks to IC28 Toys and Games would resolve the issue.

However, the sisters say now they have made the change, lawyers have since decided that this would no longer be enough.

Rolex has the largest market share of the Swiss luxury watch market.

Emma, who founded the business during lockdown in 2020, says that the rebranding would ‘crush’ their small business.

She has started a petition to try and stop the company.

She wrote: “The idea for Oyster&Pop was borne out of a desire to create a business that made fun, useful products for families.

“In the 2020 lockdowns we used our savings to set up a small business to help support our families.

“We chose the name Oyster&Pop for our clocks because we were born and raised on a road called “Oyster Bend’’ right by the beach in Devon. We wanted to connect the company’s identity to our family roots.

“We don’t think that Rolex should be allowed to stop us from using a name that is not only substantially different from theirs but has personal connections to us as the founders of a small business.

“We have invested our savings in creating Oyster&Pop, including branding, stock, our website, packaging and marketing. If we were made to re-brand then the company would not have the resources to start all over again.

“We believe that there is no risk of anyone confusing us with Rolex.”

Their online petition on change.org has now gained nearly 57,000 signatures since it was first posted on January 10.

Oyster & Pop now have until January 30 to file a defence and counter statement in response to the trademark application objection.

Emma told the BBC: “You see Formula One, and Rolex sponsoring such huge events like that - you don’t then think of a children’s clock company.’’

Rolex has been approached for a comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in