Pupil, 16, sues store for unfair dismissal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A SIXTH FORMER who made legal history yesterday as the youngest person to take a company to an industrial tribunal is claiming she suffered racial discrimination by the supermarket chain, Sainsbury's.
Celeste Shirley, a 16-year-old A-level student at Richmond College in London, was sacked in July from her part-time job at the chain's Chiswick store. She was accused of credit card fraud following eight queries by customers over transactions made on her till. Ms Shirley, from Acton in west London, who is black, is claiming discrimination and wrongful dismissal.
The tribunal in central London was yesterday told by Ms Shirley's counsel, Gazi Khan, that white staff under similar suspicion were not disciplined.
Jason Galbraith, for Sainsbury's, said the suggestion was "outrageous" and added: "That simply is not the case."
Mr Khan said: "There is a strong comparison in the action taken against white people and black employees." Tribunal chairman Michael Rabin asked whether he truly meant what he said. "White people are at liberty to defraud and steal from Sainsbury's because they will not take action - is that what you are suggesting?" he asked. "That is quite an extraordinary statement."
The tribunal was adjourned until April.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments