Prosecutor: Don't dismiss doc's 25-count murder indictment
A prosecutor says an Ohio court should refuse to dismiss the murder indictment for a hospital doctor charged in 25 patient deaths
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Ohio court shouldn't dismiss the 25-count murder indictment for a hospital doctor accused of ordering excessive painkillers for patients who then died, the prosecutor argued in a new court filing.
William Husel who worked in the Columbus-area Mount Carmel Health System, has pleaded not guilty and maintains he was providing comfort care to dying patients. He was charged only in cases involving at least 500 micrograms of fentanyl — dosages big enough that prosecutors say they indicate an intent to end lives.
Husel's lawyers sought to get the indictment dismissed, arguing that Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O'Brien wrongly influenced the grand jury and prejudiced Husel by excluding information about another patient who received even larger doses and survived for days afterward. The defense argues that patient's records would contradict the prosecution's case, but O'Brien says those records don't contain exculpatory evidence.
Prosecutors called the defense request meritless in a court filing on Tuesday, and said the judge shouldn't even have an evidentiary hearing on the matter as scheduled later this month. Husel's challenge asks the court to prematurely and impermissibly “assess the legal sufficiency of the State's evidence” in proving the charges, and that's to be determined at trial, not beforehand, they wrote.
They also said Husel's request to see transcripts of the grand jury proceedings, which are usually secret, asks the court “to presume he was wrongfully indicted" but doesn't meet the bar of showing he'd be deprived of a fair trial if he is denied the transcripts.
The case against Husel, 44, is among the biggest of its kind ever brought against an American health care professional. Mount Carmel’s review concluded he ordered excessive painkillers for about three dozen patients who died over several years.
His colleagues who administered the medication weren’t criminally charged, but the hospital system said it fired 23 nurses, pharmacists and managers, and it referred various employees to their respective state boards for possible disciplinary action.
Mount Carmel has reached related settlements totaling more than $16.7 million, and lawsuits by more patients' families are still pending.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.