Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Prion theory which defied the CJD orthodoxy

Charles Arthur Science
Saturday 06 June 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

STANLEY Prusiner has been on the wrong side of scientific orthodoxy for almost his entire career, which mixes medicine and science.

Professor Prusiner developed the theory of "prions" - misshapen proteins which can cause infectious diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) and BSE - in the 1980s as an extension of his medical work after one of his first patients died from a form of CJD.

Prion theory overthrows previously accepted ideas, which insisted that genetic components - DNA - are required to pass diseases. Professor Prusiner said that misshapen proteins could on their own cause diseases that eventually destroy the brain by causing similar proteins in the body to become misshapen as well. That, he argued, triggers an avalanche in which misshapen proteins increase until cells die. That his opponents - who hold to the DNA theory - are now in the minority testifies to his strength of will and the power of his idea.

But the theory is incomplete. It doesn't explain exactly how the misshapen proteins trigger the avalanche, or why the disease can take so long (sometimes decades) to appear. Even his supporters were surprised this year when Professor Prusiner received the Nobel Prize for Medicine; Nobels are usually awarded for work which has proved itself fully.

Yet his declaration yesterday that he does not think there was a link between BSE and "new variant" CJD (v-CJD), which has so far killed 26 Britons, seems to take unorthodoxy beyond even his extraordinary limits.

The link is not just a hypothesis. Two important scientific papers have used independent methods which show that the two diseases are closely linked. Late in 1996 John Collinge of St Mary's Medical School in London analysed the molecular weight of BSE prions, and of "normal" CJD, v-CJD and scrapie (the sheep form of BSE). He found that v-CJD and BSE prions have distinctive molecular characteristics.

Then last year Moira Bruce of the Neuropathogenesis Unit in Edinburgh compared mice injected with BSE, and other mice injected with v-CJD. Both developed the same sort of damage to the brain, different from mice given "normal" CJD or scrapie.

Finally, only Britain has had an epidemic of BSE in which huge numbers of infected cattle passed into our food. And only Britain has v-CJD, which is definitely a new disease - doctors the world over have checked.

The delay between the appearance of BSE and v-CJD also matches what is known about the incubation times of these diseases.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in