Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

POVERTY: CSA `forcing cuts in benefit' for poorest single parents

Glenda Cooper
Sunday 02 March 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Child Support Agency is hurting the poorest children by using punitive measures against parents, reducing their income support by up to 25 per cent, according to the Child Poverty Action Group.

Three in four parents left to care on their own for children are on income support. In many cases such parents are unwilling to pursue the absent parent, as the CSA demands, because to do so would "risk harm or undue distress" to them or their child. If they are unable to convince a child- support officer that they are at risk in this way, they face a financial penalty which lasts for at least three years and which means a pounds 20 reduction in income support per week. For a lone parent over 25 with a child under 11 this means a reduction in support from pounds 81.80 to pounds 62.14 at 1997/98 rates.

But some parents suffer this cut rather than risk the violence or break- up of an amicable arrangement that may result from pursuing the absent parent.

Sally Witcher, director of CPAG, said parents left to care for children on benefits should not be made to co-operate with the CSA. However, a spokesman for the Department of Social Security dismissed the report as "one-sided and biased".

8 Child Support: Issues of the Future - available from CPAG Ltd, 125 Bath Street, London EC1V 9PY at pounds 5.95

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in