pounds 30,000 award for a lost mother's love
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An 18-year-old whose mother was killed in a car crash when she was a baby was awarded pounds 30,000 for the loss of her mother's love and support by the High Court in London yesterday.
Samantha Lewis, of Westhill, Aberdeen, brought the unique claim against the driver of the car which collided with that of her mother, Jane Lewis. William Osborne, of Benfleet, Essex, was convicted of careless driving in March 1978 and was fined pounds 25 and had his licence endorsed.
Miss Lewis lived with her father for a short time afterwards but after he remarried spent the next few years bouncing between relatives and council foster homes before finally settling with an aunt in Aberdeen.
Announcing the judgment, Mr Justice Sedley said: "At 13 months of age, Samantha was not capable of appreciating the fact of her mother's death but perfectly capable of becoming aware of her absence.''
Any damages recoverable by Miss Lewis for the injury resulting from the loss of her mother, who was aged 21 at the time of her death, should not be reduced to reflect the "compensatory care given by her aunt and others." The question was whether the loss of her mother's services should be quantified as a loss suffered by "a happy and well-balanced child, which is what Samantha would very probably have been, or by an unhappy and disturbed child, which is what she became.
"The court is today doing what it can to recognise that the injury suffered goes beyond the bare loss of services which could be replaced by employing a housekeeper or nanny, and includes a maternal element ... The courts are called upon in cases such as this to quantify a loss which ... no sum of money can ever repair, and the law under which they have done so ... limits them to a valuation of a mother's services, where the real loss is of a irreplaceable human being.''
The judge reduced the amount Mr Osborne's insurers must pay to Samantha by 25 per cent to pounds 30,000 because her mother was not wearing a seatbelt. Samantha did not attend yesterday's hearing.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments