Porter opens challenge to Westminster surcharge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There is nothing wrong with local authorities having politically motivated policies provided they are justifiable on local government grounds, the High Court heard yesterday.
Dame Shirley Porter and four former colleagues from Westminster Council were beginning their legal challenge to a pounds 31m surcharge over the "Homes for Votes" affair, a case which could have serious implications for local government.
Anthony Scrivener QC, representing Dame Shirley Porter, yesterday accused John Magill, the district auditor, of having "misconceived the role of politics in local government" in accusing the former leader of Westminster City Council of "disgraceful and improper gerrymandering" in his final report issued last year.
Mr Scrivener said that Mr Magill's decision to hold Dame Shirley and her colleagues liable to repayment of pounds 31.6m for alleged council losses had exposed them to "financial ruin".
He said: "It is true that Shirley Porter's father was the most successful barrow-boy of all time, building up the Tesco empire, but pounds 31m is a massive sum for anyone."
Mr Magill - who sat in the back row of the court yesterday but who will not give evidence during the five-week hearing - reported last year on Westminster's attempts between 1987 and 1989 to win votes in marginal wards by moving council tenants and selling homes cheaply under the right- to-buy scheme.
But Mr Scrivener said: "We would suggest that improving conditions in marginal wards has been a frequent and legitimate tactic by ruling parties in local government as long as there were also local government grounds for doing so."
Dame Shirley is expected to give evidence in the case for the first time on Monday. Her fellow appellants are former council deputy leader David Weeks; former housing committee chairman Peter Hartley; former managing director Bill Phillips, and Graham England, Westminster's former housing director.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments