Politics: Directive `to cost employers pounds 2bn'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government came under pressure yesterday to review its adoption of the Working Time Directive because it would cost employers pounds 2bn.
John Redwood accused Peter Mandelson, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, of "cynically slipping" the legislation through during the summer recess to bypass business and avoid criticism.
Speaking during a debate on the new regulation, Mr Redwood, shadow trade secretary, said: "The Directive adds administrative burdens that penalise even good employers who already provide good leave and reasonable working hours."
Serbian President Milosevic had made "some progress" toward meeting the UN demands over the conflict in Kosovo, Robin Cook told MPs.
But the Foreign Secretary warned during Question Time: "There is a long way still to go before we have secured a self-governing Kosovo with its own elected leadership and free from repression from Belgrade.
"Now is the time to keep our guard up," he added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments