Politics: Call for Irvine's job to go
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TONY BLAIR yesterday slapped down a Labour backbench call for Lord Irvine of Lairg's post of Lord Chancellor to be abolished, and replaced by a Commons-based Secretary of State for Justice.
A Commons motion, sponsored by Robert Marshall-Andrews QC, and signed by 50 Labour MPs, prompted a Commons question to the Prime Minister during question time yesterday, when David Amess, Conservative MP for Southend West, said the MPs had lost confidence in Lord Irvine.
He said the MPs were not only demanding an end to Lord Irvine's extravagance - spending pounds 650,000 refurbishing his Lords apartments - but they wanted his job to be abolished, too.
The Prime Minister said there was no question of that. "No, I won't do that," he said, "because the manifesto commitment of the Labour Party in respect of reform both of criminal justice and legal aid is clear, and we are carrying them out under the excellent services of the Lord Chancellor."
Mr Marshall-Andrews, MP for Medway, said the motion was in no sense an attack of Lord Irvine, but rather an expression of concern over his constitutional role.
He said there was "a sense of unease that this is a very powerful public figure who is not elected. One can very quickly remedy that as part of the reform. It is, frankly, an anachronistic post".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments