Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Politics: Beckett blow for union hopes of recognition

Anthony Bevins
Wednesday 11 March 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MINISTERS have decided to reject a TUC demand for trade union recognition on the basis of a simple majority of those voting in workplace ballots.

An explosion of union anger will be provoked by the decision when it is revealed in a "Fairness at Work" White Paper policy statement, due to be published in May.

But Margaret Beckett, President of the Board of Trade, says in an interview for today's New Statesman that both the CBI and the TUC have "legitimate points of view" on the matter.

While the TUC wants a straight majority of those voting, the CBI is demanding a much tougher threshold for union recognition - a majority of those eligible to vote. It is also calling for exemption for companies with fewer than 50 employees.

Mrs Beckett says in today's interview: "Our task is to construct a legislative framework which is practical in solving disputes in those small number of cases when they arise."

While the TUC wants any legislation to contain hard-and fast rules, the Government will instead offer conciliation procedures to resolve disputes.

A measure of the union response to that compromise was provided in another New Statesman interview, last month, when Bill Morris, general secretary of the transport workers' union, threatened strikes in support of recognition, if the unions did not get their way. "This is a defining issue for trade unionists," he said. "There is simply no room, for compromise. The Government will not be able to fulfil its commitment to fairness at work by legislating for bad employers, which is what a compromise would mean. It's a straightforward choice: either the Government supports the CBI position, or the TUC position."

On the basis of what Mrs Beckett is now saying, Mr Morris is going to be disappointed. But ministers are determined to crack the traditional "them-and-us" divide. Employers and unions will be encouraged to work out solutions to their differences, and if they fail, they could be required to go through a conciliation body that would be there the resolve intractable disputes.

On the other controversial issue she is currently dealing with, Mrs Beckett again reflected the Government's search for a working partnership, saying: "The caricature of business hating the minimum wage was never entirely true, and the unions have taken the view for a long time that it's the principle that matters most. Surveys suggest a lot of wage settlements are already being biased towards the lower-paid. It's happening without a noticeable impact on differentials."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in