Police chiefs attacked for opposing Howard reform
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The head of a senior police association yesterday attacked what he described as "young" and "so-called progressive" chief constables for opposing Home Office proposals for tough new sentencing regimes.
At the same time, Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, conceded that his plans for a crack down on repeat offenders may fail to become law before the general election if opposed in Parliament. His proposals cover minimum sen- tences for repeat burglars and drug dealers, and automatic life sentences for second-time sex and violent offenders.
The accusation of attitudes being too liberal came from Chief Superintendent Brian MacKenzie, president of the Police Superintendents' Association of England and Wales, speaking at its annual conference in Stratford-upon- Avon. He had heard of university-educated chief constables opposing Mr Howard's key planks, but said it was "in the national interest" for them to go through.
Mr Howard, speaking at the conference, stressed that the proposals should pass to the statute book." However, they have already prompted stern opposition from the judiciary, including the previous Lord Chief Justice, Lord Taylor. In May, Lord Taylor said: "Never in the history of criminal law have such far-reaching proposals been put forward on the strength of such flimsy and dubious evidence."
The judiciary believes minimum sentences would limit their discretion in fitting punishment to cases. The measures would also increase the prison population.
Jack Straw, the shadow Home Secretary, says Labour will oppose any plans for the removal of judicial discretion. tNew legislation to outlaw stalking could be on the statute book before the next general election, the Home Secretary said yesterday.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments