Police bidding system ruled out by minister
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PATRICIA WYNN DAVIES
Political Correspondent
The Government yesterday ruled out controversial proposals to make police forces compete with each other for funds, amid Labour accusations of one of the swiftest ever political U-turns.
David Maclean, the Home Office minister, described as a "non-runner" detailed recommendations by the consultants Price Waterhouse, commissioned by the Home Office to analyse new ways of distributing cash to police in England and Wales.
The accountants proposed a strictly limited bidding system under which forces would submit a case for cash from the overall national budget for "particularly cost-effective or innovative proposals that would not otherwise be affordable, or deal with exceptional one-off policing tasks".
The firm's report, which follows a request by the Association of Chief Police Officers for an independent review of a new police funding formula introduced six months ago, concluded that a bidding system would "lubricate" change and "stimulate efficiency and good practice".
Jack Straw, Shadow Home Secretary, attacked the proposals as a "dangerous Dutch auction" that would increase central control of the police. He said the "top-slicing" of the existing pounds 3.2bn central government grant to forces would mean many police budgets being cut to pay for a few successful bids.
"If just one per cent were top-sliced, police forces would lose pounds 32m currently earmarked for normal running costs, the equivalent of 938 police officers," Mr Straw said.
He warned that a bidding system would provide an "enormous temptation to ministers to tie successful bids into their controversial system of national targets for police forces which themselves have increased Home Office direction over local police".
Mr Straw said the scheme would introduce top-slicing for revenue and running costs, as opposed to capital budgets, for the first time.
He insisted Home Office officials had presented the report to a meeting with police authority finance representatives only last Thursday.
"There was not the least suggestion that this barmy recommendation was about to be ditched," Mr Straw said. "Indeed, why present the report at all if its recommendations were not under active consideration?"
Mr Maclean told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that the report was nothing more than one of a series of suggestions that had been "spewing out" of Price Waterhouse.
"The police specifically asked for this report," he said. "But the police don't like it, I don't like it. We are not going to implement it."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments