Poetry Society sued over Internet 'slur'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOHN McKIE
The Poetry Society is being sued over claims from a small publishing firm that it has lost business worth more than pounds 100,000 after a society bulletin appeared on the Internet.
Forward Press Limited is seeking damages from the Poetry Society and an injunction after it was accused in an Internet message before Christmas of preying on vulnerable poets.
The message on the society's World Wide Web newsletter named Forward Press, which is based in Peterborough, among companies that "rarely have any interest in literature".
It maintained that these companies are "in the lucrative business of vanity publishing involving preying on poets who cannot otherwise get their poems printed".
It took Ian Walton, chairman of Forward Press, three court visits before the message was removed from the Internet on 10 January. He said yesterday: "We have published 25 titles this year and been in existence since 1989. We feel they have lost us well in excess of pounds 100,000.
"I have got 1,000 letters from people thanking me for publishing their poetry and, for every 100 grateful letters, there is only one angry one."
The Poetry Society, a 3,000-member charity funded by the Arts Council, has been in existence since 1909. Its director, Chris Meade, said it would be "vigorously defending'' the writ.
Mr Meade would not comment further but the society is believed to be irritated by the growth in "vanity publishers", who promise to publish a poet's work only to issue it to a select few.
Maura Dooley, a poet, said: "Everyone in the world of poetry recognises that vanity publishing is a problem. If an organisation feels it has been wrongly accused, it should be working with the Poetry Society, not launching a writ against it."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments