Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Richard Dawkins explains why he's backing Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson

Dawkins suggests he is the lesser of two evils

Chris Mandle
Friday 06 November 2015 12:45 EST
Comments
(Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Richard Dawkins has voiced his support for Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson.

The writer and biologist’s endorsement may sound surprising, however, as he has previously called the American neurosurgeon a “disgrace” for denying the existence of evolution despite having a prolific career in the field of medicine.

But thankfully his support is merely a tactic.

Dawkins suggested on Twitter that it could be beneficial lending his support to Carson so he could inevitably lose to a Democratic president further on in the election.

“Is it naive to say the more absurd the Republican candidate the better chance of Democrat victory? Support Carson for “G”OP candidate?” he said.

Dawkins has been critical of Carson in the past.

In an interview with CNN he said it was a “disgrace” that Carson did not believe in evolution.

“For a very senior eminent distinguished doctor as he [Carson] is to say that is even worse. Because of course, evolution is the bedrock of biology and biology is the bedrock of medicine.

"He clearly doesn’t understand the fundamental theorem of his own subject. That is a terrible indictment."

He added: “It is a form of arrogance to say we know what God does."

“The only way to know anything is by looking at the evidence. In this particular case, the evidence is overwhelming… In the case of evolution, there is no doubt. It is a fact.”

His comments came after Carson stood by his belief that the Egyptian pyramids were actually use to store grain rather than for placing dead pharoes in.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in