Oscar Pistorius: Athlete could still face murder charges after appeal over ruling allowing prosecutors to upgrade conviction is struck out
Disgraced Paralympian runner killed Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Oscar Pistorius could still face murder charges after a court in South Africa struck out his application to challenge a ruling granting prosecutors the chance to attempt to upgrade his culpable homicide conviction to murder.
The disgraced Paralympian athlete was sentenced to five years in prison for the killing of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine’s Day in 2013.
South Africa’s National Prosecuting Authority announced it would be appealing both the verdict and the sentence he received in October.
Lawyers acting for Pistorius announced in February they had applied to argue the ruling after the appeal was granted.
But on Friday, Judge Masipa denied the defence's application on the basis that she believed her court was not the right place for it to be heard.
“I am not satisfied that this is the correct court to hear this application,” she was quoted as saying by The Guardian.
“There is really nothing new in the submissions by counsel for the applicant Pistorius.”
Her ruling means the supreme court of appeal cannot refuse to hear arguments on the basis that the defence did not attempt to appeal against the state's application.
Masipa handed down a culpable homicide ruling, as she said Pistorius did not intend to kill Ms Steenkamp and acquitted him of murder.
However, she concluded he acted negligently when he fired four times through a locked bathroom door at close range, where Ms Steenkamp was inside.
The prosecution has condemned his five-year imprisonment as "shockingly inappropriate".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments