Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Niloufar Ardalan: Women launch hashtag in solidarity with Iranian footballer stopped by husband from playing in Asian championships

Campaigners say not being allowed to leave the country without your husband's permission is a human rights violation that needs to be urgently addressed

Heather Saul
Friday 18 September 2015 12:56 EDT
Comments
Niloufar Ardalan, the Iranian women's futsal captain, has been banned from playing by her husband
Niloufar Ardalan, the Iranian women's futsal captain, has been banned from playing by her husband (Facebook)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A hashtag is being used to highlight the restrictions facing many women who live in Iran, after a female footballer’s story made international headlines.

Niloufar Ardalan captains Iran’s women’s national football team, but she will not be able to lead her teammates in a tournament next week.

Her name appeared in newspapers across the world after it was reported she would be unable to join her teammates travelling to Malaysia because her husband, Mahdi Toutounchi, would not sign papers allowing her to leave.

Mr Toutounchi is a sports journalist who reportedly refused to allow her to travel because he wanted her to be present for their young son’s first day at school on 23 September.

This date clashed with the Asian Football Confederation Futsal Championship, which takes place between 21 September and 26 September.

Ardulan (left, wearing white) has expressed dismay over her husband’s decision
Ardulan (left, wearing white) has expressed dismay over her husband’s decision (AP)

Married women in Iran are required to have their husband’s signatures in order to renew their passports, unless they specifically agree to lose this power in marriage contracts.

Iran’s discriminatory laws mean this happens to women every day and Ardalan’s case was reported internationally after she spoke to the Nasim Online news agency.

Women are responding to Ardalan's story by sharing the hashtag #WeAreAllNiloufarArdalan to show solidarity with those restricted by these laws.

Iranian journalist and campaigner Masih Alinejad is now urging political leaders to follow on from the publicity Ardalan’s case has received by looking at the oppression facing all women in the ultra Conservative country.

Ms Alinejad, who runs the My Stealthy Freedom Facebook page, stressed that Ardalan’s situation represents a wider problem faced by many women in Iran who do not enjoy support for their rights because they do not have Ardalan's fame.

She told The Independent that a woman not being allowed to leave the country without her husband’s permission is a human rights issue that needs to be urgently addressed.

“The truth is that it is happening to all women for decades but because this time a well known women exposed it and complained about it many women joined her,” said Ms Alinejad.

“It is horrific that all of the women in Iran are suffering but because they are not as known as Nilofar the world and the media keep silent.

“It is beyond sad when a man must decide what a woman does; it is a human rights violation. What gives one human being the right to have this power over another? It belongs in the dark ages."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in