Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mark Zuckerberg: Charlie Hebdo attacks won't silence freedom of speech on Facebook

The CEO said the platform will remain committed to providing a service where users can freely express their opinions in spite of extremist threats

Jenn Selby
Friday 09 January 2015 09:08 EST
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Mark Zuckerberg has issued a strong response to those responsible for the attack on French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on Wednesday.

The social media CEO said that Facebook will remain “committed” to providing a service where users can express their opinions and beliefs “freely without fear of violence”, even if the content causes offence.

Relating the murder of 10 journalists – including four of France’s most celebrated political cartoonists – to his own experiences of Islamic extremism, he posted the following statement:

Facebook’s policies on censorship, however, remain the subject of much scrutiny.

The #FreeTheNipple campaign gathered pace throughout 2014 in response to the platform’s ban on showing images of women breastfeeding, which was lifted over the summer.

Meanwhile, graphic images of animals are allowed to be shown “in the context of food processing or hunting as it occurs in nature”. As are human injuries, including “deep flesh wounds” and “crushed heads, limbs”.

Facebook was also criticised for allowing the sharing of beheading videos. It initially refused to delete graphic images of American journalist James Foley being decapitated by Islamic State militants in Syria, but later blocked the content.

A Tibetan activist recently accused the platform of deleting an image showing a monk's protest.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in