Famous woman wins court injunction to stop details of her affair with high profile married man being leaked by lover
The woman started legal action to obtain the gagging order under the Human Rights Act after her partner threatened to publish her diary
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A high profile celebrity woman, who has been described as a “figure of trust”, has been granted a court injunction to prevent her lover from leaking details of her affair with a famous married man to the press.
The woman, named only as CHS, started legal action to obtain the gagging order under the Human Rights Act after her partner discovered she had been adulterous by reading her diary.
The boyfriend took photographs of the “intimate” entries describing her second relationship with a “very high profile” married man, named as Mr Y, the Mail Online reports.
Her partner confronted her about the affair and, following a heated argument, he agreed to delete the images of her diary providing she delete Mr Y’s contact details from her iPhone and iPad. However, he discovered she still had the details a few weeks later, and threatened to expose her affair.
The events led CHS to seek a High Court ban on the publication of the diary entries, in a case held in Manchester.
Judge David Hodge QC granted her an interim injunction.
“It is said that the potential damage which could be done, both to the claimant, as a public figure of trust, and to Mr Y, as a public figure who is married to someone else, is enormous,” the judge said.
“The claimant believes that if the documents stolen from her were shared in the public domain, both she and Mr Y would be irreparably damaged, and there would be enormous financial repercussions for both of them. Mr Y is said to be unaware of the present situation.”
He added that the motivation for the publication was malicious. The hearing, he said, was allowed to go ahead without her partner being present over fears he would rush publish the diary entries before it was possible for her to gain the injunction.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments