Chloe Madeley: Online rape threats 'must not be interpreted as freedom of speech'
The former Dancing On Ice contestant and daughter of Richard and Judy was recently threatened with rape on Twitter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Chloe Madeley has said that online trolling does not fall under “freedom of speech”.
The daughter of television presenters Richard Madeley and Judy Finnigan was threatened with rape on Twitter, after Finnigan made a controversial comment about convicted rapist Ched Evans on Loose Women, in which she claimed the attack was ‘not violent’.
She later apologised for the remark, but daughter Chloe was soon after targeted by trolls, who sent vicious messages and threats, which her father, Richard, promised would be investigated by the police.
Chloe, 27, has called the remarks “utterly pathetic”.
The incident prompted Justice Secretary Chris Grayling to announce plans to quadruple the maximum prison sentence given to internet trolls.
People who post venomous and harassing messages online could face up to two years in prison – an increase on the six months currently in place for perpetrators.
Madeley has now released a statement, which stated while she believes in freedom of speech, “threats of any kind” cannot be classed under the same category.
“Threatening to harm others is extreme and crosses the lines of personal opinion into criminal behaviour,” she wrote.
The tweets I made this week were frightening, persistent and violent and sadly, too easy to make on a public forum.”
She added that she is “pleased” to see the government addressing the issue of trolling.
“I do feel that the problem lies with the Communications Act, which is 10 years ago and created before pre-Facebook and pre-Twitter,” she noted.
The ever-caustic Katie Hopkins added her voice to the subject last week, arguing that online criticism was just one of the downsides of being a celebrity and something that those in the public eye should simply “accept”.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments