Cheryl Cole named 'the most dangerous celebrity' on the internet
Spyware, adware, malware and viruses – all virtual ailments you can catch from Googling the name of the X Factor judge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Her steely glare across the X Factor judging panel. Her quick tongue. Her mean left hook in a Surrey nightclub bathroom circa 2003.
There are many reasons why the name ‘Cheryl Cole’ strikes fear into the hearts of the general public. Now, the internet is afraid of her, too.
The singer, known as Cheryl Fernandez-Versini after getting married earlier this year, has just been named the “most dangerous celebrity” to look up online in the UK by web security providers McAfee.
The second most dangerous name on the internet is a little more surprising – Daniel Radcliffe. He’s followed by Jessie J (less surprising - she's terrifying) at third most dangerous.
Meanwhile, all five members of One Direction appear in the Top 20 most dangerous, with searches for Harry Styles the most risky at eighth most dangerous.
Samantha Humphries-Swift, McAfee Labs product manager, said: "The desire for consumers to have access to the latest celebrity information can often make them vulnerable to cybercrime.
"Most consumers do not realise the security risks they are exposing themselves to when searching for celebrity videos and images online. But cybercriminals can exploit this desire for breaking celebrity news, leading consumers to sites that download harmful malware on to their devices and compromise personal data."
In terms of dangerous world searches, US chat show host Jimmy Kimmel is the worst name you could type into Google. His moniker carries a 19.38 per cent risk of entering a site with malicious content.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments