Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Celebrity injunction: Judges to rule on whether privacy order should be overturned

A tabloid newspaper has appealed a ban preventing them from publishing details of a high-profile man's alleged 'extra-marital activities'

Heather Saul
Monday 18 April 2016 08:07 EDT
The Court of Appeal granted the original injunction in January
The Court of Appeal granted the original injunction in January (AFP/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Judges at London's Court of Appeal will today announce their decision over a newspaper’s appeal to overturn a privacy injunction banning them from reporting on a celebrity’s alleged “extra-marital activities”.

The man, identified in court papers as PJS, took legal action to stop the Sun on Sunday from identifying him and his spouse, identified as YMA, earlier this year.

The Court of Appeal granted the order after balancing PJS's human right to respect for family life and the newspaper's right to free expression. In their ruling, they said identifying the couple and publishing the story would be “devastating” for him and would “generate a media storm”, which would, in turn, make their young children the subject of increased media attention.

The newspaper appealed the decision on Friday, asking judges to withdraw the injunction because the man - who is described as being in the entertainment business and in a relationship with someone who is also a well-known individual in the same business - has been named by publications in the US, Scotland and other countries. The injunction only applies in England and Wales.

PJS is asking for the injunction, the first to reach the Court of Appeal for five years, to stay in place. Lord Justice Jackson, Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Simon are listed to rule on the newspaper's application today after analysing the evidence presented at the hearing on Friday.

Additional reporting by Press Association

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in