Celebrity injunction: Helen Wood criticises cost of privacy orders for protecting only the wealthy
The former escort said she was unable to get an injunction to protect herself because she didn’t have a ‘spare £50,000'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A woman who allegedly had a sexual encounter with a British actor protected by a privacy injunction has condemned the system for ensuring only the wealthy can protect their identities in the press.
Helen Wood was named by tabloids in 2010 in reports alleging she had a sexual encounter with the footballer Wayne Rooney and another woman. The beautician and Daily Star columnist is back in tabloids again this week after a US magazine named the actor who allegedly paid her for a sexual encounter, despite an injunction preventing media in the UK from identifiying him.
The married man secured the injunction in 2011 after High Court judges agreed it violated his right to privacy. A decision was made at a later date to allow the press to identify Ms Wood.
Appearing on Russia Today’s Sam Delaney's News Thing, she said the only reason she did not get an injunction was because she could not afford one.
“Everyone should be able to have them, I don’t think it’s fair that only rich people can be able to have them - for obvious reasons," she said.
“If I’d had the chance I'd definitely [have] f***ing got one but I didn’t just have a spare £50,000 there to go and get it. Why is it alright for some people to be named, and others not?”
Obtaining an injunction can cost the complainant up to £500,000, according to the media lawyer Mark Stephens. He told the Independent this injunction would have cost between £50,000 and £75,000.
The debate surrounding privacy injunctions is taking place as justices at London's Supreme Court consider whether an order preventing The Sun on Sunday from publishing details of a well-known man's alleged sexual encounter should be lifted.