Averil MacDonald: Scientist who said women are more opposed to fracking because they 'don’t understand it'
The leading scientist has been accused of reinforcing sexist stereotypes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Talking sense or full of hot air?
Definitely the latter, her critics would say. Averil MacDonald, a leading scientist and lobbyist for the shale gas industry, has been accused of reinforcing sexist stereotypes after saying that women are more opposed to fracking than men because they “don’t understand” it.
Oh dear, what was her reasoning?
The chair of UK Onshore Oil and Gas and emeritus professor of science engagement at the University of Reading said women preferred to go with their “gut reaction” and “are always concerned about threats to their family more than men”.
Is that so…
Speaking to The Times, Professor MacDonald said: “Why are men persuaded? That’s because an awful lot of facts have been put forward.” She added: “[Men] will say, ‘fair enough, understand’. But women, for whatever reason, have not been persuaded by the facts. More facts are not going to make any difference. What we have got to do is understand the gut reaction, the feel.”
Science’s new Tim Key?
Like the Nobel Prize winner who was derided earlier this year after remarking that women should be banned from labs because they cry, Professor MacDonald has been rebuked, though it remains to be seen if she will be forced to resign as Sir Tim was.
What have her critics said?
Dame Anne Glover, the former chief scientific advisor to the European Commission, told i: “I am perplexed by the comments, it doesn’t ring true to me. Of course women are concerned with their families but in my experience so are fathers.” She added the comment wasn’t “helpful”. Shadow minister, Louise Haigh MP, said: “I can assure Averil MacDonald that I understand fracking fine and am opposed to it nonetheless.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments