Pension claims flood tribunals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ministers have been warned that the industrial tribunal system is in danger of seizing up after a wave of applications from part-time workers claiming full pension rights.
Since a critical European ruling, tribunals have been inundated with 40,000 cases, 30,000 of which were launched in the fortnight before Christmas. The overwhelming majority of applications came from women, a majority of the five million part-timers in Britain.
In recent years, industrial tribunals have been processing about 60,000 cases a year and it is feared that the system will not be able to cope with the added workload.
Unions have warned that there are thousands more cases in the pipeline.
In September, the European Court of Justice ruled that it was unlawful to exclude part-timers from company pension schemes and that they could claim benefits as far back as 1976.
The Government expressed fears at the time that industrial tribunals would not be able to deal with the new workload and warned that the judgment would deter firms from taking on part-time workers.
All the big unions have delivered claims, including Unison, the public services' union, the Transport & General and Bifu, the banking union with a large female membership.
Bifu alone has lodged 2,500 applications and Ed Sweeney, its deputy general secretary, said employers were trying to use part-time staff as cheap labour and must now pay the price. "We've put a lot of effort into identifying part-timers affected by this discrimination and we want members who think they're covered to contact us."
More than 1,300 claims cover current and former staff at the TSB, which did not admit part-timers who worked less than 18 hours a week to its pension scheme until 1991. Mr Sweeney, however, said that all the high street banks were involved, as were many building societies.
"The employers could short-circuit this whole exercise by agreeing to backdate all pensionable service. They can afford to do that in the finance industry." Otherwise, the Government should put more resources into the tribunal system to help with "an avalanche" of claims.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments