Payroll vote stifles rebellion
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MPs REACTED with fury yesterday as the Government wheeled out the 100-strong 'payroll vote' to stifle rebellions in last night's debate on select committee membership. The payroll vote will also be hauled out in tonight's debate on members' office allowances.
The move, denounced by critics as a 'stitch-up' by a government afraid of its own backbenchers, comes after the furore triggered by the ousting of one its most outspoken critics, Nicholas Winterton, from the health committee. Mr Winterton, whose fate was finally sealed in last night's debate, lambasted the Government for abusing the Commons and 'annexing' the select committees.
The Government's defensive stance on office costs comes in the wake of the Cabinet's rejection of the Review Body on Top Salaries' recommendations for improving the lot of MPs' staff.
Both issues concern the House of Commons, and MPs are allowed a free vote, meaning that party business managers can only impose single-line whips requesting the presence of MPs. But, in a confidential note, Richard Ryder, the Tory Chief Whip, instructed all ministers and parliamentary private secretaries to attend the debates.
Outraged Labour MPs yesterday intensified efforts to mobilise support for an amendment to the motion tabled by Tony Newton, Leader of the House, which would peg the office costs increase to 9.8 per cent.
They are counting on support by most Labour members and votes or abstentions from some Tories. One intending rebel, Michael Fabricant, the new Conservative MP for Mid-Staffordshire, said: 'I can perfectly well defend to my constituents what I spend the money on. It is not salary and it is far below the rest of Europe.'
Edwina Currie, the former minister, said she was unhappy about the Government's stance, adding many MPs topped up staff salaries from their own pockets. 'It is not good for the country to have either well-off MPs or those who take money from outside, which can be corrupting.'
Chris Smith, a sponsor of Labour's amendment, said: 'It is surely outrageous that the Government should be dictating the level of resources available to MPs to carry out their job of scrutinising that self-same
government.'
Some Tory MPs were content to observe that the payroll vote had been regularly rolled out since the Reform Bill. But others, including those who are not fans of Mr Winterton, were privately critical of its invocation after what one called the select committee 'cock-up' - involving a last- minute rule change to ensure the former health chairman was excluded.
'There is considerable unease right across the party,' one said.
Winterton attack, page 6
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments