Paula Jones's case at risk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PAULA JONES, who recently looked set to become a millionaire twice over after suing President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment and setting the Monica Lewinsky revelations in train, could end up without a cent.
Unofficial reports yesterday said lawyers for Mr Clinton had withdrawn a $750,000 (pounds 470,000) offer to settle. A $1m offer from a New York millionaire, Abe Hirschfeld, to settle the case to save the nation from more embarrassment has also fizzled out.
This week Mrs Jones reduced her demand to $950,000 but lawyers for Mr Clinton, whose political need for a settlement was diminished by the Democrats' showing in this week's elections, rejected the proposal and said they were in no hurry to settle.
They appear to be waiting for the ruling on Ms Jones's appeal. If the appeals court upholds the lower-court decision to dismiss the case, Mr Clinton would not be liable to pay anything.
Mrs Jones would be thousands of dollars in debt to her successive teams of lawyers.
Meanwhile, prospects of a clash loomed yesterday between the White House and the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee after the chairman, Henry Hyde, released the text of the 81 questions that the committee wants Mr Clinton to answer in advance of impeachment hearings.
The purpose of the questions, according to Mr Hyde, is to "narrow" the scope of the inquiry and reduce the time it will take.
But the nature of the questions, which span the gamut of points raised by Mr Clinton's sworn testimony - from whether he helped Ms Lewinsky with her search for a job and whether he gave her a present of cigars - made it highly unlikely that Mr Clinton would be able to answer without incriminating himself.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments