Parliament: Tories attack lack of fraud control
SOCIAL SECURITY
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT came under pressure to intensify its efforts to combat fraud yesterday when the Tories accused them of going soft on benefit cheats.
Iain Duncan Smith, Conservative social security spokesman, asked ministers whether the Government would provide enough funding to achieve its targets to reduce fraud, particularly in housing benefits.
Challenging Angela Eagle, the social security minister, Mr Duncan Smith pointed to a National Audit Office report published last week which found that Benefits Agency accounts have failed to win a clean bill of health for the tenth year running.
The agency committed errors totalling more than half a billion pounds in 1997-98 and losses through fraud amounted to more than pounds 1.5bn.
Mr Duncan Smith asked: "Will there be enough money to meet targets and no watering down of initiatives?"
Ms Eagle said targets would be met, and "far from being watered down", the Government was "gearing up" the campaign against fraud.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments