Parliament: Social Security - Ministers `gone soft on fraud'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT was accused yesterday of "going soft" on benefit fraud by cutting funds to investigators and scaling down national campaigns to root out criminals.
The Tories claimed that Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Social Security, had also deliberately understated by half the number of arrests for fraud in order to cover up his department's failures.
Iain Duncan Smith, the Tory social security spokesman, said that the Benefits Agency security investigation service (Basis) had had to cut back its operations because it was running out of funds.
Mr Darling had stated that there had been an average of 18 arrests per month from September to December by Basis's southern command. However, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency has now directly contradicted the minister, claiming that the real figure was 36 arrests per month for the region. Investigators said that had plummeted to 16 in January because their budget ran out.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments