Parliament & Politics: Welfare - Labour peers queue up to attack benefit cuts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT'S crisis over its controversial plans to cut disability benefits deepened last night as Labour peers queued up to attack the legislation.
Lord Ashley of Stoke, the long-time campaigner for disabled rights, confirmed that he would introduce amendments to reverse the reduction and means- testing of incapacity benefits during its committee stage.
Speaking during the second reading debate of the Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill, Lord Ashley appealed to the Government to reconsider. "I cannot believe that a Labour government would want to introduce cuts to the most vulnerable in society," he said.
Lord Ashley's amendment, which is similar to the one put forward by Labour backbenchers in the Commons, is likely to be overwhelmingly supported be peers and further embarrass the Government.
Tony Blair suffered an earlier setback to his plans for welfare reform when 67 Labour backbenchers voted against the cuts, and others abstained.
During the debate, Lord Ashley's concern was echoed by Baroness Castle of Blackburn, the former Cabinet minister, who said it was unbelievable that "poor disabled" would have to be supported by "less poor disabled people".
But, opening the debate, Baroness Hollis of Heigham, the junior social security minister, defended the legislation, stressing no existing claimant would be affected by the changes.
"Incapacity benefit was and is intended to be an earnings replacement benefit when illness or disability unfortunately forces people to stop work.
"However, over the past 20 years, it has become for many an unemployment benefit."
Four out of 10 claimants were previously unemployed and someone who had worked for only six months and been unemployed for 20 years could claim it. "We don't believe that's right," she said.
She confirmed that Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Social Security, was prepared to review whether the pounds 50-a-week pension threshold for the means-testing of incapacity benefits was set at the right level.
Lord Higgins, for the Tories, said: "In our view the principle involved here is wrong. We are very concerned indeed at the way in which the question of entitlement to incapacity benefit is going to be reduced because people have been prudent enough to provide for a pension."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments