Parliament & Politics: Short defends famine stance
OVERSEAS AID
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CLARE SHORT, the Secretary of State for International Development, yesterday defended her criticisms of cash appeals to help the starving in Sudan in the face of hostile questioning from MPs.
Ms Short sparked controversy when she argued that public appeals by charities were obscuring the roots of the problems in Sudan and creating "compassion fatigue" among the public.
Appearing before the Commons International Development Committee yesterday afternoon, Ms Short again argued that money was available for the aid agencies to relieve the Sudanese famine, and that the real problem was overcoming travel problems generated by the conflict there and gaining access to the starving.
But Ann Clwyd, the Labour MP for Cynon Valley, who has just returned from a fact- finding trip to Sudan, challenged Ms Short's reasoning, saying she had been told that funding was a problem and that relief flights to famine- affected areas had been cut.
At the conclusion of repeated exchanges over the issue, Ms Short accused Ms Clwyd of raking over old ground.
"You want to stoke an old row that has now been explained," Ms Short claimed.
It would be more constructive for critics to put their energy into efforts to pressurise the Sudanese government into agreeing a ceasefire and lifting the blockade on rebel held areas in the south so food could get through, she argued.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments