Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Parliament: Northern Ireland: One brief debate transfers Ulster back to its people

Sarah Schaefer Political Reporter
Tuesday 30 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

FORMER NORTHERN Ireland secretaries, ministers and MPs queued up last night to hail the peace settlement for the province as an "historic" and "enormous leap forward".

The welcoming sentiments were given as the Northern Ireland Order, which will implement devolution and transfer powers from Westminster to the new Assembly, cleared Parliament.

Speaking during debate in the Lords, the former Tory secretary of state Lord Mayhew of Twysden said the risks involved were "manageable and justified. There have been times, and no doubt long periods of time, when that elusive objective [of ending direct rule] seemed very remote indeed.

"But now we have an agreement which represents not so much a step as an enormous leap towards that objective. It is a leap which has saved the people of Northern Ireland, for a short time at least and in any event, from a poisonous political stalemate and it offers them an enormous opportunity."

Lord Merlyn-Rees, a Labour former Northern Ireland secretary, added: "There are problems ahead, but this is a great day for Northern Ireland. We must all do our best to help in every possible way."

Lord Laird, a crossbencher who lives in Ulster, praised the "very difficult and courageous decision of David Trimble and his official Unionist party.

"I have been a member of that party for 35 years. I have witnessed sights that I would not wish to describe to anyone here. I have lost colleagues and relations, friends and next-door neighbours in tragic circumstances - yet I think it is to the great credit of my party and inspirational leadership of David Trimble that we have got to this position."

Earlier, the Northern Ireland minister Lord Dubs said the measure represented "the triumph of normal democratic politics over violence. Let's give it a chance. This Order, although one of the shorter pieces of legislation I have brought to the House, marks one of the most significant of all these. It represents the triumph of normal democratic politics over violence as a means of accommodating different traditions and viewpoints in Northern Ireland."

Lord Dubs said that although there was scepticism about the decommissioning of weapons by paramilitary groups, and concern about what the Government would do if it did not happen, he believed it would take place.

Lord Glentoran, a Tory hereditary peer who lives in Antrim, welcomed the Order as "historic". But, he warned: "A word of caution. The terrorist threat has not yet gone away. Organised crime flourishes with the various paramilitaries. A high level of policing and vigilance must remain in the province and in the mainland despite the political problems this may create."

Lord Goodhart, for the Liberal Democrats, said it was an occasion for "relief that the peace process had survived its voyage".

In a reference to the appointment of Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness as Minister for Education, Lord Goodhart asked for "checks and balances" to allay people's fears about actions by ministers representing parties whose views were highly controversial.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in