Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Parliament: Intelligence: Committee breaks silence on cost of keeping spies

Colin Brown
Thursday 25 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITAIN'S SECRET and intelligence services were castigated by an all-party group of MPs last night for allowing huge cost overruns on their luxury headquarters in London.

The rising cost of housing Britain's UK-based spies, MI5, so alarmed Baroness Thatcher when she was prime minister that she forced the security service to cut the cost of its headquarters by pounds 70m. The details of the overspending by Britain's spy masters were disclosed to Robert Sheldon, the former Labour chairman of the Public Accounts Committee but were covered- up on the grounds of national security.

They were brought to light yesterday when the special committee giving oversight to MI5 and MI6 decided to publish the figures for the first time. The cost of refurbishing Thames House, the MI5 headquarters, for the security service rose more than three times from an estimated pounds 60m to a final figure pounds 227m, which would have been more had Lady Thatcher not intervened.

A similar story of spiralling costs arose over fitting out the MI6 headquarters, Vauxhall Cross, which rose from pounds 22 m to pounds 81m. The committee, chaired by Tom King, a former member of Lady Thatcher's cabinet, said there had been no justification for keeping the figures secret and in future they should be published.

The MPs warned that similar cost overruns would not be tolerated for the new listening post, the GCHQ headquarters. David Davis, the Tory chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, said he strongly supported putting the costs into the public domain. He said it was necessary to keep some things secret in the democratic oversight of the secret and intelligence services but it "should be confined to issues which are genuinely secret in nature".

The committee also urged the Government to give MI5 and MI6 more money for combatting tobacco smuggling after receiving evidence that the agencies were unable to allocate resources of "any significance" to combat the illegal trade. The Treasury reckons it loses pounds 1,500m a year from duty and tax avoidance on cigarettes. "We believe that any additional resources given to the agencies to allow them to conduct work in this area could be self-funding for the Exchequer through the recovery of duty and tax," said the MPs.

They were told that Colombians supply the majority of cocaine in the UK and that Turkish groups supply 90 per cent of the heroin. `The committee believes that more could be done by the agencies to prevent the drugs reaching the UK," they added.

The threat posed by international terrorism, includingdrug smuggling, and the proliferation of nuclear or chemical weapons was growing. The Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, had devoted much of its effort to stop weapons of mass destruction spreading from the former Soviet Union and Saddam Hussein's Iraqi forces.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in