Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Parents' legacy of failure

Tuesday 30 January 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The children of the rich stand a much bigger chance of staying rich, and those of the poor a still larger chance of staying poor than the rest of us, new research published today shows.

And the chances of staying at the top of the income distribution table if your parents are there are appreciably higher than the chance of climbing to the top of the pile if your parents are poor, work from the Institute of Fiscal Studies shows.

The results use the National Childhood Development Study, which tracked all children born in one week in March in 1958, measuring their achievements and life chances to the age of 33 compared to that of their parents. The study found individuals' attainments in education and the labour market were related to their parents' performances a generation previously.

Ability as measured by a maths test at the age of seven, together with educational achievement, proved important influences in whether people did significantly better or worse than their parents. But the study was unable to answer the question of whether such achievements were due to inheriting their parents' abilities or were the result of their family background. None the less, the son of a father in the top one-fifth of the income distribution was more than three times more likely to end up in the top fifth than in the bottom fifth. And there is a clear "intergenerational transmission of poverty" through unemployment. Those raised in households where the father was unemployed are roughly twice as likely to end up with a history of unemployment themselves. Equally, children of less well-off parents are more likely to end up unemployed than those with better-paid fathers.

9 Two Nations? The Inheritance of Poverty and Affluence. IFS, 7 Ridgmount Street, London WC1; pounds 6.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in