Oxbridge 'no longer elite universities'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.OXFORD AND Cambridge universities are no longer among the "big names" of international scholarship, one of Britain's most eminent academics said last night.
Professor David Cannadine, new head of London's Institute of Historical Studies, said British universities had fallen behind Yale and Harvard in the United States.
In a devastating indictment of British higher education, Professor Cannadine, who returned to the United Kingdom last year after 10 years at Columbia University in New York, said British universities are no longer world- class and fail to compete with their American counterparts. In his inaugural lecture, he said academics here are producing increasingly poor research - "with all the frenzied energy of battery chickens on overtime" - which no one is reading. Lack of money and too much bureaucracy have stifled creativity.
Professor Cannadine, author of the acclaimed The Decline and Fall of the British Aristocracy, said: "British universities may still allow for the grinding out of routine pieces of research and writing, but it is not an environment in which serious or sustained or original or wide-ranging creative labour can be carried on, which will open up a whole new subject, or treat an old problem in an entirely new way, or capture the imagination and interest of the general public."
Most British academic historians are less confident, creative and imaginative than their American counterparts. He described British history lecturers as underpaid, overworked and suffering from low morale.
"They discourage their brightest students from following in their footsteps, on the (highly responsible) grounds that their prospects would be bleak; and many of them, once they reach their forties, are waiting and longing for early retirement." He said historians produced 2,000 books and 5,000 articles in 1997, prompted by the Research Assessment Exercise, which requires academics to be productive to push up their department scores and hence their funding.
But no one is reading this research, the professor said, because there is too much of it and it is poor quality. "Late 20-century historians are increasingly coming to resemble another sad, demoralised and proletarianised fraternity: the handloom weavers of the early 19th century," he said
By contrast, American universities are well-endowed. In 1996-97 Columbia had an endowment worth $3bn, Stanford $4.4bn, Princeton $4.9bn, Yale $5.7bn and Harvard $11.1bn. These prodigious accumulations of academic wealth help to produce a buoyant, optimistic environment, he added, where teaching and research is valued as the whole point and purpose of university life.
nForty head teachers yesterday threatened to resign from the National Association of Head Teachers if the union continued to "vilify" the chief schools inspector, Chris Woodhead, and call for a criminal investigation into his relationship with a sixth-form student.
Cannadine interview,
Education section
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments