Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Oldest mother has no regrets

Kim Sengupta
Friday 09 May 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The world's oldest mother yesterday said she had no regrets, despite the fact she is in the centre of an international controversy over her "miracle child".

Mrs Arceli Keh, now 64, gave birth on 7 November, when she was 63, to her daughter, Cynthia. Speaking from her home in Highland, California, she defended her decision to have a child so late in life, saying: "I would do it all over again if the doctors would let me. My husband and I would love to have a second child.

"I intend to to be around for a long time. A number of people in my family have lived well into their nineties, so I've got very good genes. I plan on devoting every minute of my life to this little bundle of joy - and because I am retired I can do that, which some working mothers cannot do."

She and her 61-year-old husband Isagani, originally from the Phillipines, began trying to have a natural child when she was 47, soon after they married in l980.

The following year, she was told there was no chance of a child.

So, lying about her age, she signed up for in vitro fertilisation t the University of California in l993 - five years past the age set by doctors as an upper limit for the treatment, which cost pounds 20,000 and succeeded after five attempts.

Kim Sengupta

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in