Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

William J. Tuttle

Tuesday 28 August 2007 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I first heard the name of William J. Tuttle when Sophia Loren mentioned it to me during an interview more than 40 years ago, writes Revel Barker [further to the obituary by Tom Vallance, 11 August].

She was making a movie called Lady L co-starring Paul Newman and David Niven and was required by the script, written and directed by Peter Ustinov, to age from 18 to 80. Looking 18 was no problem for La Loren (she was 30 at the time) but progressing through six more decades required all the ingenuity of Mr Tuttle, who was MGM's top make-up man.

The ageing process on Loren's face and neck took hours every morning as layers of rubber were overlaid and etched with wrinkles and crows' feet, capillary tubes simulated prominent veins, and bags were created beneath her stunning brown, green-tinged, almond-shaped eyes. How accurate his work was can be judged by comparing pictures of the 80-year-old Lady L character with recent pictures of the former movie star, who will be 73 next month.

To me – but I am biased – the basic effect was to make the then most beautiful woman in the world look like the most beautiful woman in the world with tons of stage make-up. I saw her on television recently and she looked less like the aged Lady L in the movie and more like she had looked when we met in 1965.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in