Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Professor Maurice Wilkins

Friday 15 October 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"You have a duty to go to Porton," Maurice Wilkins told us, writes Tam Dalyell [further to the obituary by Professor Watson Fuller, 9 October].

It was the autumn of 1965, and the first Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology was discussing what topic we ought to address next, following our major report on the nuclear power industry. I suggested we look at the defence research establishments such as the Royal Radar Establishment at Malvern, Serl (the Services Electronics Research Laboratory) at Baldock and the Chemical Defence Establishment at Porton Down.

This met, hardly surprisingly, with resistance by defence ministers. So I persuaded the chairman of the committee, Arthur Palmer, and the leading Conservative members Sir Harry Legge-Bourke and Airey Neave to come with me to King's College London to visit the prestigious laboratory of Maurice Wilkins, and hear what they had to say.

We were struck by the intensity of Wilkins's political beliefs. In particular that we should go to Porton. Science must be geared to the promotion of peace. Legge-Bourke and Neave were taken aback by the vehemence of Wilkins's developed Pugwash-CND views.

Asked about what difference a Nobel Prize had made to his life, with a gentle smile he responded:

People now listen to what I say about global issues. And I'm at ease with myself. The Cambridge examiners in the Natural Sciences Tripos were not unjustified in awarding me a lower Second, but a Nobel Prize makes up for it. One of the most contrite letters I've ever received came from one of the examiners, then retired. I had spent so much time on the political situation in the late 1930s that my work suffered. I told the examiner I was not sure that I had made the wrong choice!

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in